I was dissatisfied, however, with Lott’s assessment of Christian fiction. In the introduction he says that the: I don’t believe an artist must be a Christian to create a work that glorifies God. Take Pietá by Michelangelo for example. If Pietá was a short story I don’t think Michelangelo would even have submitted it to a “Christian” Review and Lott probably wouldn’t have thought of accepting it. I feel like this so called “clash” is imagined, a call out for an unnecessary crusade that stems from evangelical’s fear of the secular. And it’s frustrating to me that an anthology like this looks for art in small (Christian) circles. OK, I’ve made my spiel. For more on the subject Madeleine L’Engle’s Walking On Water is a great exploration into the intersection of art and faith. The Best Christian Short Stories are good stories but they aren’t “radical” as Lott proposes in the intro. Some of the stories, like Bret Lott’s, ended too happily ever after for me, (isn’t that a typical Christian motif?) but Larry Woiwode’s “Firtsborn”, which was featured in the New Yorker in 1982, was a knock out. The book was also published as Not Safe But Good Vol. 1 and 2. I hope to review the second one soon. Update: An interesting blog here by Lucas Kwong entitled “Good Art, Good Grief”.
“…clash between the Christian worldview that says there is a supernatural God and the world of contemporary literature that preaches relentlessly, the world is what we make it, and we are our own, the mantra by which it seems most all contemporary art lives, eats, and breathes. For this is the difference between literary art: the face of hope the writer has not in the world to save itself, but in a God who has already saved us.”
March 28, 2008...3:00 am
The Best Christian Short Stories edited by Bret Lott
Jump to Comments
The Best Christian Short Stories edited by Bret Lott is a satisfactory group of eleven short stories written by “writers who believe in a supernatural God who loves us.” Lott is, as Christianity Today reports, “a true-blue evangelical who writes literary fiction that New York takes seriously.” And maybe that’s why I was angry at myself for reading his introduction to the book, because true-blue evangelical tends to turn me off and make me critical and cynical. And I was throughout the book. The last story saved me and I was able to put it down satisfied.

1 Comment
March 28, 2008 at 10:25 pm
oh ross, this is the best review you have done, seriously. you put some passion behind your words here and i understand your conviction. this is what gets people on “your side”, to stand up, think and pay attention. but i always understood something about you anyway - so i am going to follow your work as long as i can.
i feel that there is a part of me, that is pure woman - that understands life, love and god as the purest part of being and how can you separate your life and your experiences as anything but god given? and the best and highest expression of art there is?
ah. i could say so much more - but i should write it down for myself
Leave a Reply